Creed of a Happy Warrior

Creed of a Happy Warrior

WEDNESDAY, JULY 25, 2018 BY Douglas Wilson


A friend recently asked me for my thoughts on what it means to be a happy warrior. His take was that I was one, and wanted my views on what goes into it. I thought the assessment was fair enough, but I had not really put the question to myself in those terms, and so I wanted to meditate on it for a bit. This is what I came up with—the creed of a happy warrior.

The phrase comes initially from Wordsworth, I think. I am not aware of earlier uses of it, but because my ignorance of such things is vast, this view could be as mistaken as any number of other things I don’t know about.

. . . And, while the mortal mist is gathering, draws
His breath in confidence of Heaven’s applause:
This is the happy Warrior; this is he
That every man in arms should wish to be.

                     Character of the Happy Warrior
                     William Wordsworth

I am simply jotting down the principles that have conspired in my case, the things that motivate me. I am aware that there have been other happy warriors in other arenas who would not buy into all of these, and for some of them it may just have been a function of personality. Be that as it may, these are the principles that I would urge believing Christians to consider in our time of cultural upheaval and war. I am reminded of a phrase in Herbert’s poem, The Dawning. “Thy Saviour comes, and with him mirth.”

Some of these principle nest within others, like Russian dolls. Some of them do not—like dolls that aren’t Russian dolls. In any case, here are eleven thoughts that occurred to me.


Whatever happens, we must live our lives trusting in a sovereign God. When we are in the midst of conflict, we are in the middle of troubles. In such a circumstance, it is easy to get distracted by the troubles, particularly by the person who brought the trouble to you. But as Thomas Watson once pointed out, we have to remember the one who sent the trouble to us.

More often than not, the one who brought the trouble to you is an adversary, an enemy. It is easy to focus on that fact alone, forgetting that absolutely everything that happens to us does so in the palm of the Father’s hand.

“For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10).


The Father who sent all these troubles to you is the same Father who sent His Son to die mangled on a cross in order to liberate you and me from our sins. Our confidence is therefore in a sovereign Father, and not in a que sera sera fatalism. We may fight with abandon precisely because we are not abandoned. Fatalistic warriors can be grim and fell, but never merry.

“Therefore, my beloved brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord” (1 Cor. 15:58).


Many Christians spend a lot of time fighting for their joy, when they ought to consider fighting with it. Joy is not the treasure behind us that we are fighting for, it is the sword in our hand that we are fighting with.

“Then he said unto them, Go your way, eat the fat, and drink the sweet, and send portions unto them for whom nothing is prepared: for this day is holy unto our Lord: neither be ye sorry; for the joy of the Lord is your strength” (Neh. 8:10).


We are not a bunch of rag-tag volunteers, fighting for the Lord as it suits us. We were all drafted, and have been mustered into a regular army. We have uniforms, and standardized weapons. We are under orders, and are supposed to fight as required. One of those requirements is to rejoice when we are assaulted. We must not only not be astonished when the bullets of slander start to whistle by, we are commanded to rejoice when the fighting reaches this level. Congratulations—the devil thinks that you are worth shooting at.

“Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you” (Matt. 5:11–12).

“Count it all joy, my brothers, when you meet trials of various kinds,” (Jas. 1:2, ESV)

“Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets” (Luke 6:26).


It is not possible to fight well when you are encumbered. One of the best ways to keep you out of fruitful conflict with those you ought to be fighting is through getting you into conflicts with those you ought not to be fighting. And one of the best ways to do that is by getting you under a backlog of unconfessed sin. When you are not confessing your sins as you ought (1 John 1:9), you are likely to be coming into conflict with those closest to you—family, spouse, fellow elders, and so on.

“Let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us” (Heb. 12:1).


No reformation worth having was ever accomplished to the sound of polite applause in the background. There will be smoke, and thunder, and yelling, and all the rest of it. But in the commotion of battle, we have an assurance from God that however our current battle is going, the outcome of the war is settled. However hot things are going for my platoon, I know that it is hotter for the devil’s armies. The Prince of Peace is bringing peace, but He is doing so through superior firepower.

“And he shall judge among the nations, And shall rebuke many people: And they shall beat their swords into plowshares, And their spears into pruninghooks: Nation shall not lift up sword against nation, Neither shall they learn war any more” (Isaiah 2:4).


In Norse mythology, their eschatological expectation was of a cosmic Alamo. The gods were going to go down in defeat before the monsters; there was a coming twilight of the gods. Now it is essential that we not believe in a final cataclysmic Ragnarök, where the good guys go down fighting the trolls, but it is equally essential that we admire it. Righteousness is more important than victory, and victory will only come to those who care about righteousness more than victory.

“If it be so, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace, and he will deliver us out of thine hand, O king. But if not, be it known unto thee, O king, that we will notserve thy gods, nor worship the golden image which thou hast set up” (Daniel 3:17–18).


We only fight because we love, and we are only to hate because of our love. “The fear of the Lord is to hate evil: Pride, and arrogancy, and the evil way, and the froward mouth, do I hate” (Proverbs 8:13). The shepherd who will not fight the wolves does not love the sheep. The shepherd who loves to fight simply for the sake of fighting, and wolves will do for an adversary, is a shepherd with disordered affections. The shepherd must hate the wolves because he loves the sheep. If he hates the wolves because he loves to hate, then he is a wolf himself.

“I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep. But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep. The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep” (John 10:11–13).


God did not create a safe world for us. Even before the sin of man ruined so much, the paradise of Eden had a serpent in it. Adam was in a momentous conflict before he sinned. God insists that we bet with real money. God requires us to risk things. This risk includes all that we hold dear, and to shrink back from it is to incur the displeasure of God. The wicked and lazy servant was the one who would not risk what had been entrusted to him. To play it safe is to play it dangerous.

“but my righteous one shall live by faith, and if he shrinks back, my soul has no pleasure in him”” (Heb. 10:38, ESV).

“He also who had received the one talent came forward, saying, ‘Master, I knew you to be a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering where you scattered no seed”  (Matthew 25:24, ESV).


What does it mean to prove something? It means to obligate belief. Now what happens when you obligate belief in someone who did not want his belief obligated in that way, in that direction? That’s right, it makes him angry. This is the source of much of the conflict we experience. We say thus saith the Lord instead of it seems to me. The message of the Bible is proclaimed and declared by heralds. John the Baptist did not come out of the wilderness issuing invitations to seminars. The classical approach to persuasion pulls the punch at this point, and puts the listener in control of the situation. The source of most of our conflict with the world is because they are removed from that position of control, and this is why so many Christians want to retreat from the methods of unvarnished declaration, the kind of declaration that obligates belief.

“The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, Make straight in the desert a highway for our God. Every valley shall be exalted, And every mountain and hill shall be made low: And the crooked shall be made straight, And the rough places plain: And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, And all flesh shall see it together: For the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it. The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh is grass, And all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field” (Isaiah 40:3–6).


Folly is foolish, and wisdom is not. Wisdom can look foolish initially, and folly can look wise initially. Things can be jumbled for a time. Only the Scriptures are sharp enough to make these distinctions, especially in the midst of conflict over them, and when the distinctions are aptly made, we can often tell that they have been from the laughter. We often miss the earthy peasant humor of Christ (that He could use to devastating effect) because we read our Bibles through seven or eight layers of high gloss sanctimony. But Jesus was not afraid to make fun of what might be called tarantara tithers.

“Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward” (Matt. 6:2).

“Answer a fool according to his folly, Lest he be wise in his own conceit.” (Prov. 26:5).

So there you go. Initial thoughts.

The Anti-Christ

Brainerd Dispatch Article, by Pastor Eric: June 19, 2018

The Bible is Truth. Truth about God and truth about humanity. The Bible also tells the end of history; that in the last days, there will be times of difficulty, which will be full of human and supernatural conflict, climaxed by the coming of an adversary of God, called in Scripture of the Man of Lawlessness, or the Anti-Christ.  

II Thessalonians 2:3-4 Let no one deceive you in any way. For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction, who opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God.  

So why will many follow him?

Simple. No human remains neutral when it comes to the heart; Human are born needy of something to worship; which makes them feel compete and safe.

Peruse the Christian best-sellers list: How God-ward are most of the titles? Or are most expecting God to make us feel good today? Are the majority focused on making the Christian life more easier?

Ask people to evaluate their church: so often you hear about what people feel, see and enjoy

Enter the Anti-Christ. He is a complete tyrant, but he doesn’t look that way….for Anti-Christ is the embodiment of everything we wish God to be. The Anti-Christ is impressive; He counters every disappoint with the slowness of God;

Does not God often seem to be silent, or behind-the-times?

For the truth is that our Flesh, our natural sinful, fallen desires want and earthly messiah. We will readily follow and sell-out someone who gives us all now, who seems to give everything Jesus has failed to deliver to our expectations, who gives us religion and provision, power and prestige. This is the hell-bound, deceptive work of the final Anti-Christ and all in this age with the spirit of Anti-Christ (I John 2:18)

Who is the True Christ then? The Lord Jesus was tempted by Satan, and in Matthew 4:1-11 refused earthly success, earthy religion of sight and feel: Provision, Power, Prestige…

Why? the Lord Jesus Christ met our deepest needs: our sin problem; not what we feel we need.

He was a Prophet–We need truth—or our eternal souls, in a world of lies.

He was a Priest–We need a sacrifice to offer God; for the eternal penalty of our sin.

He is the true King–We need eternal victory, triumph–over the World, flesh and Devil


The Lord Jesus laid down his life for the sheep; to save us from eternal hell, the Anti-Christs never do this.

Who is the end of true Faith? What is it’s object? The true messiah, Jesus Christ: He was killed for sinners and raised from the dead. He is alive still. We thank him, receive him with reverence repentance, and worship. In Him we have life. He is our Priest, prophet and and King: the true need our our souls. And if your faith is in Him alone, trusting in his Word, repenting of trusting in yourself and all the anti-christs in the world, you will received sight someday in the new heavens and new earth.   


II Thessalonians 2:14-15 To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ. So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter.

Spring Conference Audio and Notes

The audio from our April 21  Spring Conference, God and the Christian Mind: How to Think, Discern and Walk in this present world, is now available on the home page under the “sermons” link. Please take the time to be challenged, edified and ultimately blessed as those who were able to attend in person. 


Here is the link to Dr Caneday’s power point slides from his talk on “Human Sexuality in an age of Calculated confusion


Here is an additional recommended article Dr. Caneday sent after the conference…a clear explanation of Cultural Marxism:


And Here is the website for Dr. Peter Jones, whose writing was recommended at the conference


Additionally, Here is the recommended list for further study:  

Recommended Podcasts, Articles and books  for Christians


White Horse Inn (practical theology and apologetics)


Mortification of Spin (Practical discernment for the church)


Revive our hearts (Nancy Leigh DeMoss)


The World and Everything in It (daily world news)


5 Minutes in Church History (Dr. Steven Nicols) (24 hour internet radio from R.C Sproul ministries)


Lamplighter Theater (7:30 p.m. on radio drama for the family)


Renewing your mind  (RC Sproul and Ligonier Ministries)


Stand To Reason (Greg Koukl’s call-in-show—apologetics and Biblical Wisdom)


Just thinking (Darrell Harrison–tackles race, social justice and other political hot-buttons using Scripture)  


Alpha and Omega Ministries/the Dividing Line (Dr. James White, covers world religions and discernment)


Cross Politic (three guys discuss politics and the Bible from Moscow,  Idaho )


Wretched Radio (Todd Freil–discernment and Biblical wisdom)


Theology on the Go (Theological terms and doctrines defined)


Grace to you (John MacArthur’s sermon podcast)


Fighting for The Faith (Discernment from a Confessional Lutheran perspective)


Three Guys Theologizing (Church and life from a pastor, parishioner and professor)


Sound of Sanity (Pop Culture and discernment from a Reformed Perspective)


The World We Made (The Sexual Revolution and its affects from Warhorn Media)


Recommended Books and Articles:


Love Thy Body: Answering Hard Questions about Life and Sexuality, by Nancy Pearcey


Gospel and the Christian Mind: Recovering and Shaping the Intellectual Life, by Bradley Greene


The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert, by Rosaria Butterfield


Christianity and Liberalism, by J. Gresham Machen


Beyond the Bounds: Open Theism and the Undermining of Biblical Christianity, by Paul Helseth, John Piper and Justin Taylor (with article by Ardel Caneday)


Elect from Every Nation: Racial Reconciliation won’t happen if we don’t take Ephesians seriously, article by Paul Helseth  


Multiculturalism goes to College, article by Ardel Caneday


Let’s Get Biblical: Moving from Scripture to Theology concerning Racial Reconciliation, article by Ardel Caneday


Right Reason and the Princeton Mind: An Unorthodox Proposal, by Paul Helseth


The Race Set before us: A Biblical Theology of Perseverance and Assurance, by Ardel Caneday and Tom



The Great Work of the Gospel: How we Experience God’s Forgiveness, by John Ensor


A Gospel Primer for Christians, by Milton Vincent


Bitesize Theology, by Peter Jeffery


Recommended Websites (fellowship of Reformed and Reforming church’s in Northern Minnesota) (daily dose of discerning articles) (Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals)  (World Magazine news)  (RC Sproul Ministries)  (Dr. James White) (Darrell Harrison) (Douglas Wilson)  (Peter Jones) 





Accepted by God

“We begin each day with the deeply encouraging realization, I’m accepted by God, not on the basis of my personal performance, but on the basis of the infinitely perfect righteousness of Jesus Christ.”-John Owen

Why some avoid doctrine

This article, written by a member of the FIRE fellowship, captures what our church desires to be as well as gives reasons why the church which teaches doctrine grows very slowly--Pastor Eric 

Why do Some Pastors Deliberately Avoid Teaching Doctrine?

by Jim Elliff March 8, 2018


I have been involved in leading churches for four decades, with an emphasis on church planting in the last few years. I’ve also visited and addressed hundreds of churches around the world and have had the privilege of meeting thousands of Christian leaders. Through this time, I’ve watched an unintentional doctrinal imprecision on the part of many pastors become intentional. In other words, I have witnessed a new “conventional wisdom” emerge. Simply stated, it is the “wisdom” of attempting to circle in more people for our churches by unashamedly minimizing, or perhaps nearly eradicating, the restricting influences of doctrine. What pastors used to do (because of being poorly taught perhaps), they now do by intent, all for church growth.

The problem is, it works.

For instance, I just visited with one friend concerning a large church in our area that has grown exceptionally well. The directional pastor of this church is a smart man who has some distinct beliefs he holds personally. I can talk with him about doctrine when alone. He reads and knows the Bible. But, in his leadership and preaching, he fully intends not to go beyond the most elementary issues, and appears to not be concerned that his people differ on major doctrines, some of which are most significant. Outside of an expression of the gospel and some “how to’s,” there isn’t much to get your teeth into in his preaching. He has created a birthing station, but not much else.

Doctrine does narrow things. And we don’t like that word “narrow.” Where you will find one person who is attracted to sound doctrine, you will find a hundred who want to allow all sorts of beliefs to be tolerated. I have been in such churches where great heresies were listened to as if it were perfectly permissible to hold such views as “your opinion.” And I’m not talking about the guest’s view, but the member’s view.

This happens on the mission field as well. Preparing for a mission to Mozambique soon, I’ve been reading the reports of a good missionary doctor who has attempted to plant churches. Because he cares about doctrine, there are some real pains in building a church. He knows that because of the communal nature of the people, an apparently large church could be built easily. Whereas he may find only a handful of believers in most churches in his area, there may well be ten times as many who just attend, believing themselves to be Christian only because it is their custom to be joiners. If he were to avoid doctrine in favor of shallow evangelism, he would build a large unregenerate church. Is that useful for the kingdom? He does not believe so. But he is the exception.

Few Think of This 

In all of this acceptance of doctrinal sloppiness and miasma of beliefs, I find that many have totally disregarded a tenet that should be obvious to any Bible reader. I mean this: The apostles began churches with the intent to grow them as solidly as possible by means of a steady and meticulous interest in doctrine. The biblical data is overwhelmingly in line with this conclusion.

The apostles saw the church as “the pillar and support of the truth” (1 Tim.3:15). And so, giving attention to doctrine was paramount to them. I am sure the entire future of the work was in mind as Paul and the other apostles emphasized a wide assortment of critical doctrines. Whereas we would say, “At least we have a witness in the city of some sort, preaching Christ,” the apostles would say, “Because this church is a witness in the city, and other churches will come from this one or emulate their beliefs and practices, we must be all the more precise.”  There is a world of difference between the two schools of thought.

And these doctrines were to be “taught” and “preached.”  In other words, it was not the prerogative of those elders that were appointed by the apostles to minimize the importance of doctrinal precision. Similarly, I don’t think we can be like Jesus or like the apostles in our leadership without emphasizing what they emphasized. It is, in fact, ludicrous to think otherwise. I don’t think Paul would listen very sympathetically to our explanation of why we have minimized doctrine for the sake of church growth.

All of us are aware of the need to avoid being doctrinaire, that is, of teaching doctrine in a sterile, pedantic manner, without application and devotional “heat.” Look to Jesus and Paul as perfect illustrations of how to do teach doctrine correctly. If we teach the Scriptures faithfully and exactly as stated, we will automatically teach good doctrine. We have to be very clever to avoid it. But many do miss it, either by selecting and addressing passages that are only behavioral, or by avoiding Scripture all together, or by being a diverter, like a pastor who preaches on time management based on Jesus’ cry, “It is finished.”

We forget that the difficult doctrines that we talk about are found in the Letters to the Churches. These were epistles that contained the very truths we are refusing to talk about in our churches. Do you see the incongruity? Is it really right to think that we should not talk about those doctrines that were the staple of the earliest churches? I know I’m being overly obvious, but haven’t we overlooked this fact? And many of those difficult passages that we are absolutely afraid to teach were written to nascent churches. Paul thought it critical to present the whole truth to these people (Acts 20:27). He did not “shrink” from doing this. But we do.

What I am saying is that we do not have the luxury of avoiding these things because we want to grow a larger church. What is the effect of a new church start in New Guinea if it is grown by doctrinal imprecision? You can certainly imagine that generations of churches following that one will share similar vagueness about beliefs and practices and will leave perhaps thousands (and maybe millions, i.e. some errant denominations exemplify this) teaching error, or at least open to divergent beliefs that will be harmful to the believers and the success of the movement. It is not just wrong doctrine that will do this, but the vacuous absence of doctrine as well. Surely it can be seen that error in Christian movements is a thing that is taught and propagated one church at a time, one leader at a time, yet has a long-term permeating effect. This is so not only in a virgin church planting situation, but also where there are numerous churches. We are irresponsible to leave doctrinal precision out of the equation in our church starting and church growing. It is negligence (often planned negligence) that is destructive.

Dereliction of Duty

It is assumed that elders, of all people, are to care about doctrine. In our day this is an assumption that is not finding much support, but it must be so. If this is not so, then a whole new team of elders must be chosen. It is part of the job description. Paul says that an elder is to be “holding fast the faithful word which is in accordance with the teaching, so that he will be able both to exhort in sound doctrine and to refute those who contradict” (Titus 1:9).

When elders come together, it is part of their responsibility to work on what they believe. For instance, what is the view of the elders on divorce and remarriage? What is their view on the Law. Or election? Or the nature of man? What is their belief on Creation? Or on plurality of eldership? Or concerning spiritual gifts? Or on the nature of the atonement? Or on the role of women?  If elders do not know what they believe, how can they possible fulfill the requirement of Titus 1:9 mentioned above?

Since elders (also called overseers and pastors) are to care about doctrine, it should be in their interest to make their elder’s meetings more than just business meetings about the more mundane things or merely vision meetings about new ideas. I know we must do some of that. Visionless churches are dying churches, of course. But pastors should work hard to perfect what they believe. They should put the months of study and discussion into various doctrinal positions so that they become familiar with them and are ready to teach them. After coming to one mind on a doctrine, they should meet with the men, and then the whole church, to transmit and teach what they have learned.

Once painstakingly arriving at what they believe about cardinal doctrines, they will be willing to pay a price for them. After all, it is God speaking these doctrines to them.

As the people learn that an elder actually has some clearheaded views about things, he will be respected as a person who can help bring understanding and direction to families and veteran disciples, as well as to children and new believers.

Act Biblically Now

Paul makes my premise lucid when he says that we must “strive together for the faith of the gospel” (Phil. 1:27). He trains leaders with the words, “But as for you, speak the things which are fitting for sound doctrine” (Titus 2:1), and “The things which you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses, entrust these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also” (2 Tim. 2:2).  He worries, “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine” (2 Tim. 4:3).

Jude showed us doctrine’s import when he said that we must “contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all handed down to the saints” (Jude 3). Peter thought it necessary to stir us up “by way of reminder, that you should remember the words spoken beforehand by the holy prophets and the commandment of the Lord and Savior spoken by your apostles” (2 Pet. 3:1-2). He warns us to “be on your guard so that you are not carried away by the error of unprincipled men . . . . but grow in grace and knowledge . . .” (2 Pet. 3:17-18).

John rejoices to find “some of your children walking in the truth, just as we have received commandment to do from the Father,” but warns, “Anyone who goes too far and does not abide in the teaching of Christ, does not have God . . . . If anyone comes to you and does not bring this teaching, do not receive him . . . . for the one who gives him a greeting participates in his evil deeds” (2 Jn. 4:9-11).

For us to even attempt to build churches by minimizing doctrine is a philosophy so far removed from the original purpose of Christ and His apostles that one would wonder if we were in the same movement. How close is this to the prediction of Paul when he said that “they will accumulate for themselves teachers in accordance to their own desires, and will turn away from the truth and will turn aside to myths” (2 Tim. 4:3-4).  It is too close for me.

Therefore I urge you to reconsider how you use your leadership. There is much to do. We must be loving and comforting, praying and available, transparent and visionary, but as leaders we cannot dismiss what God insists on. If it were not so unambiguous, we might have room to debate the wisdom of this. Since this truth is repeated ad infinitum in the Word, what can anyone say against it?

Therefore, give yourself to sound doctrine and make much of it from now on. If you cannot do this, resign.

And, if you are not a pastor but a listener, go to those responsible for dispensing the truth with a sincere appeal for them to teach you doctrine without compromise. Tell them you cannot grow without it.

Lifespring Church Spring Conference: Saturday, April 21, 2018


God and The Christian Mind: The Biblical way to think, discern and walk in this present world


II Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness,  that the man of God[a] may be complete, equipped for every good work.


Location:  Lifespring Church, 30 Hallett Ave, Crosby, MN (

Date:  Saturday, April 21, 2018 (1:00-9:00 p.m.)

Who:  Parent, Students, adults and young people of all ages  

Cost: It’s Free!  (Free-will donation basket will be available to onset the cost of the meal)

Do I need to register, therefore? Yes. Please, please register at (search: God and the Christian mind)

Why this Conference?  How do we walk the wise path of life living in our increasingly secular and pagan culture;  with all kinds of subtle, siren voices leading us down the path of destruction. God has give us his revealed Word, which is sufficient to make us wise for salvation and all of life (Proverbs 3:16-17, II Timothy 3:15) What must we believe, and how does Scripture lead and guide us to think, live and discern?  

Speakers:  Paul Helseth and Ardel Caneday are seasoned professors and churchmen who are also long-time friends and colleagues in Bible and theology Department at Northwestern University–Roseville.  Both have  taught a generation of college students in the Sufficiency of Scripture to address all the needs and dilemmas of the current culture. Many former students will testify to How God used their classes and their counsel to help set them on a God-ward trajectory for life.

Dr. Paul K Helseth is professor of Christian thought at Northwestern and a member of Good Shepherd Presbyterian Church (PCA)

Dr Ardel B. Caneday is professor of New Testament and Greek at Northwestern and a member of Bethlehem Baptist Church.    

We believe that all, young and old, will benefit from both the teaching, worship and good fellowship among Gods people.

*We  would encourage you to view this as an opportunity to intentionally invite young students

1:30—Welcome  and singing

1:45—Session 1:  The Doctrine of Creation and the Christian Mind


3:00—Session 2: The Myth of Neutrality and a Sacramental View of the Universe

4:00–Session 3 :  Scripture: How God Makes Himself Known

(with Q/A following)



7:00—Application: How to Rightly Discern: Human Sexuality in an Age of Calculated Confusion

8:00—Application: How to Rightly Discern the New Social Justice  Movement

(with Q/A following)



Proverbs 2:1-12a My son, if you receive my words  and treasure up my commandments with you, making your ear attentive to wisdom and inclining your heart to understanding; yes, if you call out for insight and raise your voice for understanding, if you seek it like silver and search for it as for hidden treasures, then you will understand the fear of the Lord and find the knowledge of God. For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding; he stores up sound wisdom for the upright; he is a shield to those who walk in integrity, guarding the paths of justice and watching over the way of his saints. Then you will understand righteousness and justice and equity, every good path; for wisdom will come into your heart, and knowledge will be pleasant to your soul; discretion will watch over you, understanding will guard you, delivering you from the way of evil.

Youth-Driven Culture

Youth-Driven Culture

FROM  Jan 22, 2018 Category: Articles

Maybe it began earlier than the 1950s and ‘60s, but those decades seem to mark the rise of the fascination with youth in American culture. The famous line that celebrates all things young, often wrongly attributed to James Dean, declares, “Live fast, die young, and leave a good-looking corpse behind.”

Popular music, that telling barometer of popular culture, has kept pace with this trend. Nearly every heavy-metal band of the 1980s and ‘90s had a stock ballad about young heroes going down in a “blaze of glory.” Other popmusic references stress the invincible power of youth. Rod Stewart sings of being “Forever Young.” In their hit single “We Are Young,” the contemporary super group Fun declares that these same youth will “set the world on fire.” Bruce Springsteen’s barstool-seated narrator in “Glory Days” drowns the disappointments of his middle-aged life by retelling stories of high school exploits and triumphs. None of us may want to relive our awkward junior high moments, but who among us doesn’t harbor secret desires to be young again and seemingly able to conquer the world?

The subtle and not-so-subtle pulls of the idolization of youth manifest themselves in three areas. The first is an elevation of youth over the aged. This reverses the biblical paradigm. The second is a view of being human that values prettiness (not to be confused with beauty and aesthetics), strength, and human achievement. Think of the captain of the cheerleading squad and the star quarterback. The third is the dominance of the market by the youth demographic. That is to say, in order to be relevant and successful, one must appeal to the youth or to youthful tastes. These manifestations of our youth-driven culture deserve a closer look.

The trend of exalting youth and sidelining the elderly stems from a deeper problem summed up in the expression, “Newer is better.” We celebrate the new and innovative while looking down on the past and tradition. There is a compelling vitality to youth and to new ideas, but that does not mean there is no wisdom to be found in the past. It is a sign of hubris to think one can face life without the wisdom of those who have gone before. There is something about being young that makes the young think they are immune to the mistakes or missteps of those who have gone before. We all think too highly of ourselves and our capacities. Simply put, we need the wisdom of the past and of the elderly.

Tweet this


The idolization of youth even seeps into the church. One of the ways in which we see this is in the stress on church youth groups. Curiously, Jonathan Edwards, in his letter to Deborah Hathaway, referred to as “Letter to a Young Convert,” encouraged her to join with the other youth in the church to pray together and to discuss their progress in sanctification as an encouragement to one another. In short, he was calling for her to start a youth group. Youth groups can serve a significant purpose and can be meaningful ministries. However, they can separate the youth from the other age groups in the church. The church needs to worship, learn, and pray together, old and young side by side. The culture tries to push the aged away. The church cannot afford to do that.

As we need the wisdom of the elderly in the body of Christ, we also need the wisdom of the past. Newer isn’t always better. Sometimes it’s worse; sometimes it’s wrong. As the church, we are a people with a past. The Holy Spirit is not a gift unique to the church in the twenty-first century. We ignore or disdain the past to our detriment.

The way out of enslavement to this undue celebration of youth is to foster a genuinely diverse community in our homes and in our churches. Generation gaps can be awkward and barriers to both sides having genuine and authentic fellowship. But God has designed His church in such a way that we need each other. Paul specifically commands Timothy to have the older teach the younger (Titus 2:1–4). We miss out when we think we have nothing to learn from others at different stages of life. The church of today also misses out when it thinks it has nothing to learn from the church of yesterday.

Tweet this


The older may feel intimidation in trying to reach out to the younger, but the older should take the initiative. Young people can take the buds out of their ears and look up from their iPods. Children and grandchildren need to hear the stories of their parents and grandparents.

The second manifestation of our youth-driven culture is a warped view of humanity. Our culture determines a human being’s value based on how he or she looks. Parents, teachers, youth pastors, and pastors know how body image can be absolutely devastating to today’s youth. We also know theologically that human dignity, and hence human value, stems from our creation in the image of God. Our youth-obsessed culture uses a flawed metric for determining human worth.

Conversely, we also lose sight of human frailty and depravity. We are not strong. Isaiah reminds us, “Even youths shall faint and be weary, and young men shall fall exhausted; but they who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength” (Isa. 40:30–31a). The theme of God’s strength manifested in our weakness reverberates through Paul’s writings. We will not hear it, however, if we are fixated on images of youthful strength and invincibility.

We need to help youth see that their value derives from being made in the image of the Creator and of the Redeemer. In today’s culture, adolescence is increasingly difficult to navigate well. Our youth are surrounded by images of the pretty and the skinny, the young and the beautiful. Images of perfection bombard them. My friend Walt Mueller, author and president of the Center for Parent/Youth Understanding, has been studying the advertising industry for years. His conclusion? Overt and subtle images pass before a typical teen’s eyes potentially hundreds of times a week. Add to that the body-image message coming through much of pop music and movies, and you see the challenge. Youth culture needs the church’s help to think biblically about a healthy, God-honoring view of self and others.

The third manifestation of the youth culture has to do with the way the youth demographic drives the market. The economic engine driving much of popular culture, in terms of movies and music at least, is that group with discretionary funds—teens and twenty-somethings. Youth groups and even churches, desiring to be successful, hurry to catch up.

Tweet this


The ever-insightful Southern writer Flannery O’Connor once weighed in on a debate over the use of a controversial novel in a public school classroom. Rather than debate the particular merits or demerits of the book, O’Connor raised a deeper question. She observed that advocates for the book made their case by claiming it was trendy and hip, for which reason the young people of the day were into it. Why not meet them where they were?, went the argument. O’Connor instead made a case for reliance on the literary canon, not popular fiction. Then she went on the attack in her closing lines: “And if the student finds that this is not to his taste? Well, that is regrettable. Most regrettable. His taste should not be consulted; it is being formed” (“Fiction Is a Subject with a History—It Should Be Taught that Way”).

Some may dismiss O’Connor’s argument, seeing it as an elitist appeal. But she raises a fair point. There are felt needs and there are true needs. Sometimes it takes quite a few decades to see the difference.

Sociologist Christian Smith coined the phrase moralistic therapeutic deism to describe the prominent religious view of American youth. His description sticks, but how should we respond? To simply cater to such tastes is to pander. In doing so, the gospel and the demands of the Christian life are lost.

One of those rock ballads I alluded to earlier echoes again and again a haunting line: “Give me something to believe in.” It tells a story of seeking, but finding only disappointment and disillusionment. Yet the desire to believe in something persists. Sociologists tell us that contemporary youth culture values authenticity. We reach out to youth culture best by not pandering and by not pretending to be hip—it’s too hard to pull it off anyway. One person’s respect for another grows immensely when one simply speaks and lives the truth in love.

Youth culture today faces a great deal of anxiety. On nearly every level, an uncertain future waits on the horizon. But these anxieties are only the symptoms of the real problem, shadows of the anxiety humanity faces because of alienation. Our sin separates us from God. And we need someone to believe in. None of us, young or old, needs a therapeutic religion. We all need the gospel. And we all need a church of young and old—and in between—that proclaims and lives the gospel.

This post was originally published in Tabletalk magazine.